Ken Brousseau
Who We Are
Decision Dynamics LLC is the successor to Decision Dynamics Corporation established in 1983 by Kenneth R. Brousseau, Ph.D., and the late Michael J. Driver, Ph.D., former faculty colleagues at the University of Southern California. The firm specializes in the development and application of behavioral assessment tools that are used for executive recruitment, executive coaching, team development and career guidance. The firm offers a variety of behavioral assessments, including its flagship StyleView and CareerView assessments which have provided unique insights to more than half a million people worldwide in executive recruiting, executive coaching, team development and career guidance.
Who We Are
Decision Dynamics LLC is the successor to Decision Dynamics Corporation established in 1983 by Kenneth R. Brousseau, Ph.D., and the late Michael J. Driver, Ph.D., former faculty colleagues at the University of Southern California. The firm specializes in the development and application of behavioral assessment tools that are used for executive recruitment, executive coaching, team development and career guidance.
Ken Brousseau
Dr. Brousseau and colleagues published one of the largest studies ever on patterns of success for executives and managers in Harvard Business Review. This study analyzed over 120,000 managers and executives in varying industries, organizations, and levels of management.
It identified sharp profile differences between the most and least successful leaders across management roles, and identified critical moments of transition in decision styles as successful individuals move up the executive ladder.
120000
Assessed
Dr. Brousseau and colleagues published one of the largest studies ever on patterns of success for executives and managers in Harvard Business Review. This study analyzed over 120,000 managers and executives in varying industries, organizations, and levels of management.
120000
Assessed
It identified sharp profile differences between the most and least successful leaders across management roles, and identified critical moments of transition in decision styles as successful individuals move up the executive ladder.
The Dynamic Decision Style model and its corresponding StyleView TM assessment evolved from concepts and assessment methods developed in the mid to late Twentieth Century. In the past several decades the StyleView assessment has been used to assess hundreds of thousands of professionals and people in management around the globe. This research has been presented in various publications, including the Harvard Business Review and the book, The Dynamic Decisionmaker (2014).
The Dynamic Decision Style model and its corresponding StyleView TM assessment evolved from concepts and assessment methods developed in the mid to late Twentieth Century. In the past several decades the StyleView assessment has been used to assess hundreds of thousands of professionals and people in management around the globe.
This research has been presented in various publications, including the Harvard Business Review and the book, The Dynamic Decisionmaker (2014).
The Dynamic Decision Style Model focuses on four very distinct styles of thinking and deciding: Decisive, Flexible, Hierarchic, and Integrative. The styles differ in terms of amount of information used and breadth of solutions considered. None of the styles are good or bad in an absolute sense. The value of each style depends entirely on context and the situations in which they are used. A particularly unique aspect of the StyleView assessment is that the profiles produced show how people are inclined to behave when they are consciously self-aware compared to how that people think and decide when not watching or reflecting on themselves.
The Dynamic Decision Style Model focuses on four very distinct styles of thinking and deciding: Decisive, Flexible, Hierarchic, and Integrative. The styles differ in terms of amount of information used and breadth of solutions considered. None of the styles are good or bad in an absolute sense.
The value of each style depends entirely on context and the situations in which they are used. A particularly unique aspect of the StyleView assessment is that the profiles produced show how people are inclined to behave when they are consciously self-aware compared to how that people think and decide when not watching or reflecting on themselves.